A tort case-study spine should end in human legal review. Honesty note: simplified classroom tort model; jurisdictions vary; contested facts and standards matter; the pinned first step states the as-of date; not legal advice.
highlighted = computed this step
Tort model honesty note
Honesty note: simplified classroom tort model; jurisdictions vary; contested facts and legal standards matter; as of June 24, 2026; not legal advice; code encodes a stated structural model, not the law itself.
tort model as of June24,2026
Map the future tort case-study spine
The final process keeps facts, duty scope, breach trace, causation gates, damages records, defenses or exceptions, and review as separate steps.
facts→scope→trace→review
Example map size
The future case-study spine has 7 nodes and 6 directed edges.
nodes=7,edges=6
The spine has no decision output
The map has 0 decision nodes and ends in human legal review.
decision nodes=0
Diagram note
The diagram is a case-study checklist, not a claim evaluation or prediction.
checklist, not outcome
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes the stated structural model, not the law itself.
Summary
The capstone map keeps every tort concept as review data and routes the packet to a human reviewer.