Liability Models
Product Defect Labels
Product-risk categories can be labels while legal tests remain jurisdiction-specific. Honesty note: simplified classroom tort model; jurisdictions vary; contested facts and standards matter; the pinned first step states the as-of date; not legal advice.
Tort model honesty note
Honesty note: simplified classroom tort model; jurisdictions vary; contested facts and legal standards matter; as of June 24, 2026; not legal advice; code encodes a stated structural model, not the law itself.
Product-risk labels are categories
The stated process routes a product event to category labels. Legal tests vary, so the labels are not defect findings.
Example label set
Product-risk labels vary by jurisdiction and test. This flow keeps 3 labels as categories only.
The branch ends in review
The flow has 6 nodes and 1 category decision.
Diagram note
The diagram shows manufacturing, design, and warning labels as routing categories only. It does not decide a product claim.
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes the stated structural model, not the law itself.
Summary
Product-risk labels are useful only when the model keeps category routing separate from legal tests and outcomes.