Structure Models
Amendment Path Flow
Article V proposal and ratification paths can be modeled as threshold labels and process routes. Honesty note: simplified US federal structure model; jurisdictions and doctrine vary; the pinned first step states the as-of date; not legal advice.
Structured Visual
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a process and label model, not the law itself.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Structure model honesty note
Honesty note: simplified US federal structure model; jurisdictions and doctrine vary; as of June 24, 2026; not legal advice; code encodes a process and label model, not the law itself.
Use Article V process labels
The stated process models proposal paths and ratification paths as process labels with pinned thresholds.
Example threshold packet
Article V proposal labels include 2/3 paths. Ratification labels use 3/4 state paths, with Congress selecting the ratification mode.
The flow recomputes process size
The simplified process flow has 8 nodes and 9 edges from proposal path to human review.
Diagram note
The diagram is a process map. It does not predict amendment success or resolve any amendment controversy.
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a process and label model, not the law itself.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Summary
Article V data should keep proposal threshold, ratification threshold, path labels, and human review distinct.