Priority Models
Default Enforcement Handoff
Default and enforcement outputs should route to human review. Honesty note: simplified UCC Article 9 classroom toy model; not legal advice; structure only; human review required.
Structured Visual
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a toy structural model, not UCC law or priority advice. RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Article nine toy-model honesty note
Honesty note: simplified UCC Article 9 classroom model; jurisdictions, filings, collateral types, and facts vary; as of June 24, 2026; not legal advice; structure only; human review required; no neochart dependency.
Default is a handoff point
The toy model treats default and enforcement as review workflow labels, not remedies advice.
Example flow packet
The handoff map contains 5 nodes and 4 edges.
Decision rows route to review
The model has 1 decision node that ends at human review.
Diagram note
The flow shows a review spine. It does not say enforcement is available or appropriate.
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a toy structural model, not UCC law or priority advice. RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Summary
Enforcement-sensitive outputs should end at legal review, not a system instruction.