Civil wrongs, protected interests, duties, and the civil-criminal split.

Structured Visual

Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-08-28; not legal advice; Render structure, refuse interpretation, cite, abstain, and hand off.

RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.

Tort classification record: core questionsCore legal questionsGlance first; details follow in wordsWrongWrongElementsElementsCivil-criminal splitCivil-criminal split
highlighted = computed this step

Scope and honesty note

Jurisdiction: United States common-law overview with selected Texas statutory applications; as of 2026-08-28; jurisdictions and causes of action vary; not legal advice. Synthetic facts are classroom inputs, not findings. This lesson renders structure, refuses unsupported interpretation, cites, abstains, and hands off.

torts teaching model as of 2026−08−28\text{torts teaching model as of }2026-08-28

See the essential structure first

Start with this deliberately incomplete structure, then use the pinned authorities, worked application, exceptions, and handoff below. This deliberately incomplete preview has 4 nodes; exceptions and legal consequences remain in the sourced prose below.

glance nodes=4\text{glance nodes}=4

Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-08-28; not legal advice; Render structure, refuse interpretation, cite, abstain, and hand off.

RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.

Tort classification record: core questionsCore legal questionsGlance first; details follow in wordsWrongWrongElementsElementsCivil-criminal splitCivil-criminal split

Begin with the governing doctrine

A tort is a civil wrong for which law supplies a remedy, usually because conduct invades a protected interest or breaches a duty owed to the claimant. Intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability use different prima facie structures. Tort law is distinct from contract because duties may arise independently of agreement, and distinct from criminal law because a private plaintiff ordinarily seeks civil relief while the state prosecutes offenses for public purposes under different burdens and procedures.

prima facie doctrine before defenses and allocation\text{prima facie doctrine before defenses and allocation}

Pin a personal-duty account of negligence

Cardozo's bounded passage ties negligence to a reasonably perceived risk and a duty owed within its relational scope. Caption: Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad; court: New York Court of Appeals; decision date: 1928-05-29. Verbatim opinion excerpt: “The risk reasonably to be perceived defines the duty to be obeyed, and risk imports relation; it is risk to another or to others within the range of apprehension” Source: 248 N.Y. 339; pinpoint 248 N.Y. at 344; https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ny/volume_248/0339_01/index.html; data via neochart.com, snapshot 2026-08.

pinned authority: 248N.Y.339\text{pinned authority: }248 N.Y. 339

Pin Texas injury-action definitions

This provision supplies real statutory definitions used in personal-injury and wrongful-death procedure without replacing common-law tort elements. Verbatim statutory text: “DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter: (1) "Corporation" means a municipal, private, public, or quasi-public corporation other than a county or a common or independent school district. (2) "Person" means an individual, association of individuals, joint-stock company, or corporation or a trustee or receiver of an individual, association of individuals, joint-stock company, or corporation. (3) "Death" includes, for an individual who is an unborn child, the failure to be born alive. (4) "Individual" includes an unborn child at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth.” Source: Tex. Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 71.001; https://www.neochart.com/catalog/texas/civil_practice/chapter_71/section_71_001/tex_cp_71_001_0d0b9e50291f/tex_civil_practice_remedies_code_sec_71_001_definitions_in_t_0001/index.html; data via neochart.com, snapshot 2026-08.

pinned authority: Tex.CivilPracticeandRemediesCode§71.001\text{pinned authority: }Tex. Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 71.001

Pin the synthetic fact pattern

A synthetic delivery robot strikes a pedestrian after a routing decision. The record separately stores bodily harm, damaged property, operator conduct, system design, and any public investigation.

stated classroom facts, not findings\text{stated classroom facts, not findings}

Work the application

The trace first asks what protected interest and duty are asserted, then selects an intentional, negligent, strict, or statutory theory. It does not infer a tort from injury alone. A civil damages claim, a regulatory inquiry, and any criminal process remain distinct records with different decision makers and proof rules.

compare elements in order, preserve unknowns\text{compare elements in order, preserve unknowns}

Read the populated authority-and-fact record

The populated rows distinguish the claimant's interest, possible duty sources, liability families, civil remedy, and public-enforcement path. The rendered record contains 12 populated rows.

populated rows=12\text{populated rows}=12

Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-08-28; not legal advice; Render structure, refuse interpretation, cite, abstain, and hand off.

RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.

Tort classification record: Authority recordsAuthority recordsVerbatim snapshot sources248 N.Y. 339Palsgraf v. Long Island…Tex. Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 71.00171.001. DEFINITIONS. In this…
Tort classification record: Synthetic factsSynthetic factsClassroom facts onlyConductA delivery robot strikes…InterestsBodily security, property, reputation,…ProceedingsCivil claim and possible…
Tort classification record: Application traceApplication traceElements, limits, and unresolved…WrongIdentify a duty or…ElementsIntent, negligence, strict liability,…Civil-criminal splitPrivate remedy and public…

Read the complete record

The complete record keeps sources, stated facts, and questions for review separate. Authority records: Verbatim snapshot sources. 248 N.Y. 339: Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad. Tex. Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 71.001: 71.001. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:. Synthetic facts: Classroom facts only. Conduct: A delivery robot strikes a pedestrian after a routing decision. Interests: Bodily security, property, reputation, and economic interests are separate. Proceedings: Civil claim and possible public enforcement are distinct records. Application trace: Elements, limits, and unresolved questions. Wrong: Identify a duty or protected interest personal to the claimant. Elements: Intent, negligence, strict liability, and statutory claims use different tests. Civil-criminal split: Private remedy and public punishment differ in parties, purpose, and proof.

sources, stated facts, and open questions\text{sources, stated facts, and open questions}

Narrow summary

Start with the claimant's protected interest, the source of duty, and the correct liability family before analyzing elements, defenses, causation, or damages.

cite, compare, abstain, hand off\text{cite, compare, abstain, hand off}