Privacy Models
Authority Provenance
Legal authority and provenance should stay as source labels and records. Honesty note: simplified privacy and cybersecurity model; jurisdictions vary; the pinned first step states the as-of date; not legal advice.
Structured Visual
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes the stated structural model, not the law itself.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Privacy model honesty note
Honesty note: simplified privacy and cybersecurity model; jurisdictions vary; as of June 24, 2026; not legal advice; code encodes a stated structural model, not the law itself.
Authority stays as provenance data
The stated process stores notice and policy materials as source records. A source label is not a legal-coverage conclusion.
Example source records
The toy table includes a privacy notice record and a security policy record. The query has 3 recomputed tokens.
The retrieval table counts source rows
Authority and provenance are record fields, not conclusions. This table has 2 source records and 2 token-supported rows.
Diagram note
The diagram links source records to provenance labels. It does not say any notice or policy satisfies a law.
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes the stated structural model, not the law itself.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Summary
Authority provenance is useful when each source can be traced before any legal review happens.