Citation neighborhoods are toy graph metrics, not source weights. Honesty note: simplified toy source-explorer model, corpus-light with no neochart dependency; the pinned first step carries the full honesty note.

highlighted = computed this step

Source explorer honesty note

Honesty note: simplified toy source-explorer model; corpus-light and no neochart dependency; jurisdictions and authority treatment vary; as of June 24, 2026; not legal advice; code encodes a stated review workflow, not the law itself.

source explorer as of June24,2026\text{source explorer as of }June 24, 2026

Use a toy citation graph

The stated process builds a toy citation-neighborhood graph from authored nodes and edges. Metrics come from edges only.

metrics from edges\text{metrics from edges}

Example neighborhood packet

The toy graph links policy note, rule source, statute source, Constitution source, and case source labels.

five source labels\text{five source labels}

The graph recomputes degree and reach

The rule source degree is 2; the policy note reaches 3 nodes.

rule degree=2,policy reach=3\text{rule degree}=2,\quad \text{policy reach}=3

Diagram note

The diagram shows toy graph metrics. It does not assign source-weight labels.

graph metrics only\text{graph metrics only}

Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a stated review workflow, not the law itself.

Toy citation neighborhoodpolicy->rule lesson_depends_onrule->statute cross_refsstatute->constitution cross_refscase->statute interpretsCase sourceid case in0 out1 deg1 reach2Policy noteid policy in0 out1 deg1 reach3Rule sourceid rule in1 out1 deg2 reach2Statute sourceid statute in2 out1 deg3 reach1Constitution sourceid constitution in1 out0 deg1 reach0

Summary

Citation-neighborhood views should label degree and reachability as graph metrics, not legal ranking.

metrics not ranking\text{metrics not ranking}