Retrieval Models
Retrieve, Then Read
Retrieved snippets are pointers back to sources, not legal answers. Honesty note: simplified toy corpus; jurisdictions vary; the pinned first step states the as-of date; not legal advice; retrieval points to sources and does not answer the legal question.
Structured Visual
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a stated structural model, not the law itself. RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Retrieval honesty note
Honesty note: simplified toy corpus; jurisdictions vary; as of June 24, 2026; not legal advice; retrieval points to sources and does not answer the legal question.
Retrieve, then inspect the source
The stated process separates retrieval from reading. Retrieval can point to a record, but human review still reads the source text.
Example pointer
The query is deadline calendar. The supporting pointer cites Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1).
Snippet text is provenance
The model derives a snippet from the matching record and shows it in the table. That snippet is a source pointer only.
Diagram note
The diagram keeps match rows, snippets, and support count visible so the reader can audit the source pointer.
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a stated structural model, not the law itself. RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Summary
A RAG system should treat retrieval as opening a cited record, not as completing legal analysis.