Rule Model Foundations
Consequence Label Model
Consequence labels are model rows for review, not advice. Honesty note: simplified toy rule-modeling workflow, corpus-light with no neochart dependency; the pinned first step carries the full honesty note.
Structured Visual
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a stated interpretation workflow, not the law itself.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Rule model honesty note
Honesty note: simplified toy rule-modeling workflow; corpus-light and no neochart dependency; jurisdictions and interpretations vary; as of June 24, 2026; not legal advice; code encodes a stated interpretation workflow, not the law itself.
Use consequence labels only
The stated process stores model outputs as condition-trace, exception-review, and manual-review labels.
Example label packet
The toy model file has condition trace, exception review, and manual review rows.
The table recomputes support
The retrieval table recomputes 3 label rows and 3 token-supported rows from the authored model-label text.
Diagram note
The diagram is a model-label table. It displays review rows only.
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a stated interpretation workflow, not the law itself.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Summary
Consequence labels should stay as review rows.