Proof Models
Authentication Records
Authentication support can be modeled as source records and hashes. Honesty note: simplified evidence and proof model; jurisdictions and rules vary; the pinned first step states the as-of date; not legal advice.
Structured Visual
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes the stated structural model, not the law itself.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Evidence model honesty note
Honesty note: simplified evidence and proof model; jurisdictions and rules vary; as of June 24, 2026; not legal advice; code encodes a stated structural model, not the law itself.
Authentication starts with support records
The stated process stores authentication support as source records. A witness note or hash label is only review data.
Example authentication packet
The toy packet includes a custodian statement row and an export digest row from the classroom evidence file.
The table recomputes source support
The retrieval table recomputes 2 records and 2 token-supported rows from the authored source text.
Diagram note
The diagram is a support-record table. It points to authentication review materials without deciding authenticity.
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes the stated structural model, not the law itself.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Summary
Authentication data should show exactly what support record exists and what still needs human review.