Deontic Models
Obligation Row Model
Obligation rows carry actor, action, trigger, and due labels. Honesty note: simplified stated-rule deontic model with jurisdiction and as-of caveats; the pinned first step carries the full honesty note. Firewall doctrine: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite, abstain, and hand off.
Structured Visual
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a stated-rule label workflow, not the law itself.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Deontic model honesty note
Honesty note: simplified stated-rule deontic model; jurisdiction and as-of caveats apply; as of June 24, 2026; not legal advice; code encodes a stated-rule interpretation, not the law itself; no neochart dependency.
State the obligation row process
The stated process stores an obligation label as actor, action, trigger, and due-label fields.
Example obligation row
The toy row uses actor alpha, action send notice, trigger packet, and due label due label 1.
The table recomputes support
This model has 1 obligation row and 1 token-supported row.
Diagram note
The diagram is an obligation-row table. It displays label fields only and does not tell any actor what to do.
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a stated-rule label workflow, not the law itself.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Summary
Obligation rows are useful as review records because actor, action, trigger, and due labels stay explicit.