Digital Evidence Models
Criminal Procedure Handoff Map
Digital evidence process labels should hand off to lawyer, judge, and human review. Honesty note: simplified US federal classroom model; Fourth Amendment doctrine and state rules vary; the pinned first step states the as-of date; not legal advice.
Structured Visual
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a process and label model, not the law itself.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Digital evidence model honesty note
Honesty note: simplified US federal classroom model; Fourth Amendment doctrine and state rules vary; as of June 24, 2026; not legal advice; code encodes a process and label model, not the law itself.
Build a digital-evidence review spine
The stated process connects source record, actor label, event record, warrant-or-exception label, evidence item, custody chain, and lawyer, judge, or human review.
Example case-study slots
A future case study would fill each slot with pinned facts: source, actor, event, label row, evidence item, custody chain, and reviewer notes.
The flow recomputes the route
The criminal procedure handoff map has 7 nodes and 6 edges from source record to lawyer, judge, and human review.
Diagram note
The diagram is a workflow spine. It connects review artifacts without deciding any criminal-procedure or evidence question.
Jurisdiction: US; as of 2026-06-24; not legal advice; Code encodes a process and label model, not the law itself.
RENDER STRUCTURE · REFUSE INTERPRETATION · CITE · ABSTAIN · HAND-OFF: render structure, refuse interpretation, cite provenance, abstain when unsupported, and hand off to human review.
Summary
The capstone pattern is source, actor, event, label, evidence item, custody chain, and review handoff.