Recursion and Dynamic Programming
Fibonacci with Memoization
Compute fib(n) recursively. Cache each fib(k) in a memo map so each
subproblem is solved at most once.
Algorithm
Canonical input n = 6 produces fib(6) = 8. Replay highlights every
memo write and every cache hit.
memoization
A `std::map<int, int>` cache stores each completed subproblem. Before recursing, check the memo: a hit returns immediately, a miss descends.
explicit memo parameter
Pass the memo as an explicit reference parameter so the lesson stays about caching, not language-level scoping.
Basic Implementation
basic.cpp
Replay: real traced execution (multi-file project)
#include <iostream>
#include <map>
int fib(int n, std::map<int, int>& memo) {
auto it = memo.find(n);
if (it != memo.end()) {
return it->second;
}
if (n < 2) {
memo[n] = n;
return n;
}
int value = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);
memo[n] = value;
return value;
}
int main() {
std::map<int, int> memo;
int result = fib(6, memo);
std::cout << result << std::endl;
std::cout << "{";
bool first = true;
for (const auto& kv : memo) {
if (!first) std::cout << ", ";
std::cout << kv.first << ": " << kv.second;
first = false;
}
std::cout << "}" << std::endl;
return 0;
}
memo ← {}, action ← miss -> descend fib(5)
12}13int value = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);14memo[n] = value;values this step{}memomiss -> descend fib(5)action6nmemo ← {}, action ← miss -> descend fib(4)
12}13int value = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);14memo[n] = value;values this step{}memomiss -> descend fib(4)action5nmemo ← {}, action ← miss -> descend fib(3)
12}13int value = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);14memo[n] = value;values this step{}memomiss -> descend fib(3)action4nmemo ← {}, action ← miss -> descend fib(2)
12}13int value = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);14memo[n] = value;values this step{}memomiss -> descend fib(2)action3nmemo ← {}, action ← miss -> descend fib(1)
12}13int value = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);14memo[n] = value;values this step{}memomiss -> descend fib(1)action2nmemo ← {1: 1}, action ← base 1; memo[1] = 1; return
12}13int value = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);14memo[n] = value;values this step{1: 1}memobase 1; memo[1] = 1; returnaction1nmemo ← {0: 0, 1: 1}, action ← base 0; memo[0] = 0; fib(2)=1; memo[2] = 1
12}13int value = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);14memo[n] = value;values this step{0: 0, 1: 1}memobase 0; memo[0] = 0; fib(2)=1; memo[2] = 1action0nmemo ← {0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 2}, action ← hit 1; fib(3)=2; memo[3] = 2
12}13int value = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);14memo[n] = value;values this step{0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 2}memohit 1; fib(3)=2; memo[3] = 2action1nmemo ← {0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 2, 4: 3}, action ← hit 1; fib(4)=3; memo[4] = 3
12}13int value = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);14memo[n] = value;values this step{0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 2, 4: 3}memohit 1; fib(4)=3; memo[4] = 3action2nmemo ← {0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 2, 4: 3, 5: 5}, action ← hit 2; fib(5)=5; memo[5] = 5
12}13int value = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);14memo[n] = value;values this step{0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 2, 4: 3, 5: 5}memohit 2; fib(5)=5; memo[5] = 5action3nmemo ← {0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 2, 4: 3, 5: 5, 6: 8}, action ← hit 3; fib(6)=8; memo[6] = 8
12}13int value = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);14memo[n] = value;values this step{0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 2, 4: 3, 5: 5, 6: 8}memohit 3; fib(6)=8; memo[6] = 8action4nstdout ← 8
20int result = fib(6, memo);21std::cout << result << std::endl;22std::cout << "{";values this step8stdout8result
Complexity
- Time: O(n) with memoization (vs. O(2^n) without)
- Space: O(n) memo + O(n) call stack
Implementation notes
- C++:
std::map<int, int> memo;passed by reference tofib(int n, std::map<int, int>& memo). The ordered map keeps the printout deterministic so the lesson can show the final memo state honestly. - The replay shows the call stack on one side and the memo map on the other so memo writes and cache hits are visually distinct.